Batman is a government-backed vigilante assigned to take down Superman. It’s partially a courtroom drama. It’s essentially “The World” v Superman. This gives you the granduer that will be Justice League. And I think Superman really does die in this one so they can bring him back gloriously. Until then, Batman is the interim leader of the Justice League.
Category: Pop Culture/Media
Analysis, criticism, studies on American propaganda (otherwise euphematically called “popular culture”)
-
Eastfist YouTube Channel Ad Space For Sale!!!
-
Genghis Khan in his prime

Why is it so hard to find images of what Genghis Khan looked like in his prime? The history controllers always posting pictures of him when he is old and weak looking. Surely, for a dude that conquered most of the known world, he must of looked very scary. Otherwise, no one would have followed him or died for him. Or is that just a bad assumption? Not all great historical leaders look like Gerard Butler in 300…
-
Official Design for Doomsday in Batman V Superman Dawn of Justice
Doomsday is a subterrain creature from deep in Krypton’s core. So his bones and blood is pure Kryptonite. It glows from white to green when he gets angry. Much like an elephant would kill a human, Kal-el really can’t stop Doomsday, not even on Krypton. It’s all relative.
-
FBI facial recognition software not as good as Facebook
http://finance.yahoo.com/news/fbi-billion-dollar-facial-recognition-091500415.html
By Chongchen Saelee
According to this article, FBI can match faces at 85% accuracy. Facebook, on the other hand, can do it at 97%. But let me paint a picture why that is. The fact that FBI can be that accurate is still quite impressive, but the reason Facebook’s is way better is because of their funding, the lifeblood of Facebook is CIA. FBI is like the police. They only enforce laws. CIA, however, don’t follow any laws and that’s why they seem to be more innovative, at the cost of invading billions of people’s privacy. CIA creates the weapons and tools, FBI uses them. CIA is Whistler, FBI is Blade. It’s a need-to-know basis.
The impressive thing will be which one’s algorithm can pick out a face from low-resolution images. Facebook has the advantage only because the samples are high-resolution. But FBI’s might have the edge and is more useful because it can detect faces from low-resolution. So, it’s a matter of what purpose it’s used for. One is actually smarter than the other. If FBI’s facial software can detect a face out of finite amount of pixels that don’t resemble a face, then I’d say FBI’s software is actually better.







